You are here: News & events
»
Schools Demand Answers Over SATS "Shambles"
Schools Demand Answers Over SATS "Shambles"
28 July 2008
The marking of this year’s SATS has been labelled ‘a shambles’ and has led
the Qualifications & Curriculum Authority (QCA) and the government to come
under fire regarding the whole fiasco.
The head of the QCA, Ken Boston, told a select committee of MPs on Monday 14th
July that the key stage 2 marking is now ‘100% complete’ despite hoards of
complaints from parents and head teachers saying that they have still not
received results.
The procedure for marking the tests was changed this year, with marking
contractor ETS Europe taking over the
process. The company boasted additional checks to give greater assurance
of high-quality marking. A spokesperson for the company said ‘ETS Europe
regrets the inconvenience caused by the delay in issuing the national
curriculum test results to schools. Our priority is to ensure that all of the
tests are marked to a high standard, so that schools will receive accurate
results to better serve the needs of their pupils’.
Warning signs started to appear back in May 2008 when schools reported
difficulties in registering pupils on the new database that recorded which
children took the English, maths and science tests. The government has
been criticised for not reacting to these difficulties as and when they were
occurring. Speaking to the House of Commons, Ed Balls repeated that the
responsibility for the problems lay with the QCA and ETS and himself declined
to apologise.
It is estimated that approximately 1 in 4 schools lack results and it is not
just missing results that are the issue - some head teachers have complained
about the quality of the marking, claiming that some of their top pupils had
received similar marks to children of much lower ability.
England’s National Assessment Agency (NAA), a subsidiary of QCA, has said
that there is not an issue with the quality of the marking - it simply had not
been done in time - and blamed the lateness on a ‘series of technical issues’
and described this as a serious failure.